THE GEOMETRY OF LIE GROUPS |
Lie groups like SU(N) display a nontrivial curved geometry in the angular variable space. The geometrical properties of the group space define a local metric tensor and through that covariant operations and invariant quantities like the scalar curvature and the Laplace operator. These can be used for derive formulae for group integrals or Casimir operators and hence lattice Hamiltonians more generally. In this section we take a brief excursion to this field exploring some basic ideas and presenting various useful results.
The basis of any geometrical description is a measure of distances, surfaces and volumes which is locally governed by the metric. In order to measure distances between two elements of a group we need to know the length of their displacement vector, which requires the definition of a norm. In fact a real valued scalar product can be defined in a natural way in the matrix representation
for SU(N) or more generally for any Lie group. This scalar product has the desired properties
The elements U of the SU(N) group are vectors of unit length, so
for any matrix A (not necessarily a group element). The invariant infinitesimal distance square
defines the components of the metric tensor in a given representation
through
where are the group parameters (in SU(N) compact angular variables)
and the
are the basis matrices for a given representation. They satisfy
the commutation relation
with the totally antisymmetric structure constants of the
associated Lie algebra.
Now one point here is still to clarify: how do we differentiate a group
element U?
A possibility would be to follow the general definition and take the
limit of the difference of two neighboring elements. To define
a neighborhood, however, we need a parameterized form, therefore
we would obtain a parametric derivative.
Another possibility is to construct first a one-form, a combination of
the coordinate differentials without making reference to
a special parameter set, and then consider the length of this differential.
More generally we consider the following action on a matrix X
as the covariant differential. Expanding this leads to the abstract operator equality
with
being the parallel transport or connection form. It may be familiar
to the reader from Riemannian geometry or from the theory of general
relativity.
In fact there is a striking analogy between the gauge covariant and
geometrically covariant derivatives.
In the theory of Lie groups is called the Mauer-Cartan one-form.
Since its square length
equals the infinitesimal distance squared (apart from the sign) it is sometimes also called the half-metric of the group. Since the vectors U have unit length it is easy to see that the Mauer-Cartan form defined above is hermitean
The following useful identity
where the index ``ad'' refers to the adjoint representation, which uses
the Lie algebra structure constants as basis
and therefore
for any matrix B,
can be used for the evaluation of the covariant derivative.
Note that the adjoint representation of is
equivalent with an infinite series of using n-fold commutators
Exercise: | Prove the identity (13). |
Solution: | First we define
![]() we use the Taylor expansion to obtain
|
Now using the power series form of (13) and applying it for the differential operator B=d we realize that, since
the covariant derivative is
Replacing now in this result we obtain the
Mauer-Cartan form
Writing this in component form
we obtain the components of the metric tensor
where a summation over the index k is understood. The normalization of the basis matrices
is representation dependent. If the group elements were represented in
the fundamental representation of SU(N) the normalization is ,
in the adjoint representation it is
.
Once the metric tensor in a given representation is known, the group
integral can be carried out by using the Jacobian
which leads to the Haar measure
Let us demonstrate the above in the case of SU(2). In the fundamental
representation the matrix has the eigenvalues
and
where
is the
length of the vector
. Correspondingly the projectors
onto the eigenstates with eigenvalue
satisfy
Introducing the matrix the projectors are
Using the eigenvalues and projectors any function of the matrix
can easily be obtained, especially
It can be rearranged into the familiar form
In order to obtain the Mauer-Cartan form and the metric tensor we need
the adjoint representation as well. In this case we consider a spin 1
system and the eigenvalues of are
.
The corresponding projectors satisfy
leading to
with this time.
The Mauer-Cartan form becomes
which can be written in the form
with
In order to have the projectors must satisfy
As a consequence two projectors have zero length
while from the trace relations for any
we get
in the adjoint SU(2) representation. This finally leads to
Exercise: | Calculate the determinant of the matrix
![]() |
Solution: | The determinant of a matrix is the product
of its eigenvalues. Since we
have according to (30)
we obtain
|
Finally using the radial coordinates
and
we obtain the following invariant infinitesimal distance
and the following integration measure
These results show that the geometry of the group SU(2) is analogous to that
of a surface of the four dimensional sphere with unit radius .
The essential difference is global: SU(2) can be wrapped twice over
, which is obvious since here
is the main asimuthal angle.
It is also obvious that the curvature of this space is constant.
The Laplace operator in this space, corresponding to the electric energy in the
quantized Hamiltonian lattice gauge theory, can be
written according to the above metric as
with second derivatives according to spherical angular coordinates in four dimensions
The solutions of the free SU(2) Schrödinger equation,
include the spherical functions
with the coefficients being
and the associated Legendre polynomials satisfying
such that the radial dependence factorizes
The eigenvalues in this case correspond to the pure electric
energy density of a flux line spanned over a lattice link.
In comparison with the familiar spherical functions known from the Schrödinger equation for radially symmetric potentials in three-dimensional space the radial part of the eigenfunctions of the SU(2) Schrödinger equation (40) is somewhat unusual. It satisfies the eigenvalue equation
The ansatz
separates some trivial factors leading to
This equation defines the ultraspherical functions
so that two classes of solutions occur
The proportionality factors are obtained from the normalization
of the wave function.
Finally, the solution, which is regular at , is given by
with the normalization coefficient
The energy eigenvalues are those of a quantized rotator
with being an integer or a half integer.
Finally, it is interesting to note that the radial excitations of the SU(2) quantum rotator constitute the character function of the group in the representation J
Writing this result in the alternate form
one easily realizes that J=0 belongs to the vacuum, to the
fundamental and J=1 to the adjoint representation of the SU(2) group.
For gauge fields on lattice links the lowest excitation corresponds to
J=1.
At finite temperatures on the other hand, every excitation is allowed. Since the degeneracy of a multiplet J is
the partition function for the electric field energy eigenvalues
on a link of
length a can be obtained as
with being the inverse temperature.
In the gluon sector we sum over integer values of J only.
The average electric energy can be obtained as
and the effective number of degrees of freedom
can be inspected as a function of temperature.
As expected, at high temperatures the average electric energy approaches
. Assuming equipartition at high temperature this yields
<E>=3T including the magnetic energy. Corresponding to an ideal
gas of massless relativistic SU(2) gluons. At low temperature,
however, even if all links were independent, i.e. the interlink coupling
through the magnetic energy were neglected, the electric gauge degrees of freedom
would be frozen. This situation is analogous to the Dulong-Petit rule,
known from solid state physics.